Artist tags: # Download Hey! JUMP LIVE TOUR 2015 JUMPing CARnival (DVD) [480p] PCM] [Concert] Artist • Hey!

JUMP Title • Hey! JUMP LIVE TOUR 2015 JUMPing CARnival Runtime • 01:51:19 Genre • J-Pop Release date • 2016.02.10 Setlist • ウィークエンダー • Come On A My House • Ride With Me • JUMPing CAR • Viva!

9’s SOUL • SUPER DELICATE • Puppy Boo • ペットショップラブモーション • スーツデイズ • Hey! 7ソロメドレー • ただ前へ • 我 I Need You • 明日へのYELL • 3月14日~時計 • 全27曲 Download Hey! JUMP LIVE TOUR 2015 JUMPing CARnival (DVD) [480p] PCM] [Concert].

When I first viewed this video I thought it was for the most part repetitious of part 2, but that was shortly after viewing part 2. When I went back to it a couple of days later to make the caps that accompany this review I realized that taken alone, this was probably the best of the three parts. To start with, half the video is Luna spread-eagled on the buzzsaw bed and I can't get enough of her screaming for help and writhing around. Not only does she have a dynamite body but I can't think of another actress who does a GIMP better.

Scenes this long usually make me restless but not in this case, mostly because of Luna but also because the production values and camerawork are excellent and having the scene interspersed with shots of Galas struggling in her cage with Luna’s screaming in the background enhances the final effect. And of course there is the girl-on-girl scene in the middle which is very much to my taste. So if your tastes run to what I have outlined above, you will agree with my A+. If not, I think you will rate it highly anyway.

Download Hey! JUMP LIVE TOUR 2015 JUMPing CARnival (DVD) [480p] PCM] [Concert]. JUMP LIVE TOUR 2015 JUMPing CARnival. Release date. ウィークエンダー; Come On A My House; Ride With Me.

1336) Covers. Silvio Dante said: Regarding the inside illo posted just below.the cover artwork for this issue was a classic. Why aren't we seeing that?

Going by Cover's replies to similar questions in the past, I believe he's said that he has these spread all over his machine in various folders, and the posting of these images is pretty random depending on what folder he's in at the time, so I doubt that much thought went into it. ====== @ Esso - Good review of part 3, and enjoyed the screen caps.

Still not gonna buy either parts 2 or 3, but enjoyed your expanded synopses of them. I get that you may enjoy the lesbian kissing, but I assure you, that would be the portion I'd be skipping over to get back to the GIMP action.

Howie 1344) Covers. Silvio Dante said: Regarding the inside illo posted just below.the cover artwork for this issue was a classic.

Why aren't we seeing that? Howie said: Going by Cover's replies to similar questions in the past, I believe he's said that he has these spread all over his machine in various folders, and the posting of these images is pretty random depending on what folder he's in at the time, so I doubt that much thought went into it. Actually, I am posting two different series, one scan each day.

I was specifically asked for John Duillo interiors. I have a folder dedicated to Man's Adventure Magazines, and I ran a search for all of files with 'Duillo' in the filename. I am posting the decent size examples of these interiors in alphabetical order, which seems pretty random because of the mostly meaningless filenames.

My MAM Cover of the Day posts only include covers that are on-topic for this group and they are alphabetical. As you can see, I am up to 'Battle Cry May 1966'. I use this naming format because so many of the scans I find are not properly named, but I can always read the title and month off the covers, which makes it much easier to match up duplicate scans.

Since Silvio requested it, here is Man's Book Dec 1965 V4 No6 for Silvio Dante.jpg I personally don't think this cover is particularly classic. I find the posing too static, and the GIMP's expression shows only mild concern. Plus, her outfit isn't ripped at all. But as this forum shows us, everyone sees something different. 1345) Covers. Time for a few scattered thoughts from Scourge's often demented brain: I do love those old magazine covers and contents whenever they become available. Thanks for the efforts that go into posting them.

One of my oldest eye openers to those things that we enjoy and share here was as a boy leafing through a magazine in a drug store with a story of women being hunted for sport. A passage in a story in a men's magazine many years later that has stuck with me the longest was about a young red haired Polish woman who was ever so slowly being lowered into a flaming pit. Her body gleaming with sweat, her legs thrashing as she desperately tried in vain to raise them from the hellish heat, the woman screamed loudly as a whip cracked over and over against her soft flesh. Wow, I would LOVE to see that one again!

On the subject of the format here, I would love to be able to keep some type of chronology yet at the same time be able to directly respond to other postings in a thread. I would also like the ability to post more than one pic or piece of art. Understandably, there needs to be some type of limitation as to the total size allowed to be posted. My apologies for my lack of involvement at the various groups I have helped to operate over the years at Google Groups and the one at Yahoo Groups, Scarlet Nightmares. I am still out there and I still have my interest in the subject, but for various reasons I have taken a major step back.

Lastly, on the subject of Net Neutrality, we can do our best to make a fuss with the FCC and Congress (obviously on a more general basis and not because of our concern that porn--or our particular kinks--could be tougher or more expensive to come by) and promote the freedom that the net has long been known for or merely hope for the best. But as the song goes from the Mel Brooks film The Twelve Chairs. 'Hope for the best, expect the worst!'

1348) Ralphus. Well, at any rate, I'm glad you liked this one. Your positive attitude regarding lesbian lovin' likely raised the grade a bit more, although like a few others, I can do without that stuff. Nonetheless, I happen to find Luna Vera very attractive, and seeing her as a GIMP is the reason I would check this one out.

Without having seen the film myself, I like that there appears to be a fair amount of suspense throughout the buzzsaw scene, and they give you the option of seeing Luna rescued (Boo!) along with the alternate ending where she gets the buzzsaw between the legs (Yay!) I like the concept of this Deathtrap Films company. Damsels in distress is one of those tried and true classic themes, although personally, the lack of a payoff has always seemed like a big tease to sadistic pervs like myself when the 'good guy' comes to the rescue over and over again. Not that I mind all the foreplay of the damsel being tied and struggling as the (buzzsaw, train, fire, you name it) comes closer and closer, but once in a while, I want to see her actually die. In a particularly bad way. It's not politically correct, and I couldn't care less.

NicheClips hosts clips for a crapload of producers, and it seems like damn near every one of them features women getting killed. So obviously, there's a bunch of us out there who like the same thing.

The direct link for your latest review is here: ------------------------- Duillo of the Day: (Post 1337): Like a few others, I want to read that story, too. I'll see if Sloth has the magazine and we'll put that on our list of upcoming projects to restore.

SOFT FLESH FOR FRANCE'S MONSTER OF AGONY? Looks awesome. And that Duillo illustration is fantastic.

I have to admit, I never knew who he was before Covers started to post the daily samplings, but his stuff is really great. BTW, what do people think of the new Men's Adventure Stories section? Does anybody actually read the stories, or do you mainly just look at the pictures?

I admit the writers aren't exactly Eda Chang, and I wish the GIMPy aspects of the stories went into more detail, especially considering the lurid subject matter. But on the other hand, there's usually at least a few sections of the stories that arouse my attention, and they've all been short enough that they're worth a quick read. ------------------------- J.

Scourge wrote: A passage in a story in a men's magazine many years later that has stuck with me the longest was about a young red haired Polish woman who was ever so slowly being lowered into a flaming pit. Her body gleaming with sweat, her legs thrashing as she desperately tried in vain to raise them from the hellish heat, the woman screamed loudly as a whip cracked over and over against her soft flesh. Wow, I would LOVE to see that one again! I would love to read that for the first time! The problem is, what magazine was it? Sloth has 600 or so of these gems.

Does it sound familiar to anyone? We can do requests if we can find the right issue. You also wrote: On the subject of the format here, I would love to be able to keep some type of chronology yet at the same time be able to directly respond to other postings in a thread. I would also like the ability to post more than one pic or piece of art. Understandably, there needs to be some type of limitation as to the total size allowed to be posted. We'll put you down as a vote for 'threaded'.

BTW, you can post multiple pictures right now; obviously Esso embedded several in his review. You just need someone to host the pictures, preferably one that accepts adult content. If you can't find anyone, I can always do it for you on Ralphus.net. Just send 'em to me via e-mail and I'll send you back the code.

I'm always happy to help out. 1349) Obiwan. Does anyone here remember a website called straythoughts.com?

They used to have videos as well as stories and original content as well. It went down a few years ago with no warning.

They had authors with some great stories on that site. Archived content is still there - [] I would like to contact some of the authors, in particular Laura N and Lisi. As far as I'm aware this is the only place their work was published. If anyone knows how to get in touch with them, or the webmaster, it'd be appreciated. 1350) Covers. Ralphus: That Fiery GIMP peril MAM you are seeking.

It was a fairly common theme in those mags, but one I remember very fondly is the one I posted the painting image for back in post 335. Covers posted the actual cover scan in post 371. Actually I posted an interior image that also was a story with fiery peril, post 321, which I also recall reading.

But I think post 371 is the best match for the scene described. Man's Story was one of the late entries to the MAM world. As they were more 70's period, they were pushing the MAM boundries as far as possible in those stories. Another great digest sized mag was Shocking Tales (I believe). I remember these didn't have the usual two bdsm stories (as the mag format did), but 3 or even 6 bdsm stories. Cover or anyone have those? I've seen them on ebay, but always $70 or more!!!

I'm not switching my vote to threaded post, but a search feature might be nice. It took forever to find these old posts!

Search by poster; search for text; etc. I think that would be nice to add sometime. ~Dan 1353) Esso. Ralphus: re BuzzSaw Butchers 3. The buzzsaw scene looks hot, but after that is a bunch of lesbian stuff, which usually bores me silly.

And yet you give it an A+? Okay, what's the catch? As I said in the review, if your tastes don't run to mine you might not give it an A+ but still give it a high rating. There are actually two buzz saw scenes, one preceding the girl/girl and one after. The second is a reprise of the first but with much different shots and of course a one minute more satisfying ending. Perhaps the catch is I liked the lesbian scene as an intermission and think that Luna sold her torture amazingly well; or I put a very high premium on verisimilitude, maybe more than most. BTW, if I were to put a rating on the entire series of 3 films I would give it a B+ and have serious qualms about paying about $60.

1354) Reine Margot. Sloth is a notorious firebug; I'll bet he'll have that issue, thanks. --------------------------------------- You also wrote: I'm not switching my vote to threaded post, but a search feature might be nice.

It took forever to find these old posts! Search by poster; search for text; etc. I think that would be nice to add sometime. We already have a search feature. It's called, um. Search the GIMP.

We've had it for at least 4 years now. I don't know exactly what it was you were searching for, but it's a pretty good search engine.

It can search for anything we've had posted over the past 15 years. Even better than that, since we've been here at the new location, you actually can do a search for everything posted here since February, by name, by text, whatever. It's right above where the posts start, on the right side. For instance, search messages for 'buzzsaw butchers' and everything pops up all at once, currently 18 entrees in the thread. Search by name for 'dan hawke' and it will show all your posts, currently 20 so far.

Do the same search for 'ralphus' and it will bring up all 75 of mine. So basically, for those who voted for 'threaded' in the poll question, I can counter that we technically already have a threaded forum, sort of, if you want to use it that way. 1356) Covers. Ralphus said: Damsels in distress is one of those tried and true classic themes, although personally, the lack of a payoff has always seemed like a big tease to sadistic pervs like myself when the 'good guy' comes to the rescue over and over again.

Trust me, I PROMISE, there's no good guy coming to the rescue in this one. Review of: Deadly Interrogation III Producer: MORE PKF STUDIOS [] Starring: Nicole Oring & Max Coxxx Directed by: John Marshall Price: $20.00 Runtime: 32 Minutes. Commissioned by GIMP site regular: Fritz Okay, right off the bat, this one is gonna be too brutal for some of you in here. That I PROMISE, but I fucking LOVED it! Just picked it up yesterday, and was so taken with it I had to do a review. So if it's not your thing, well then, I don't know what to tell ya.

Skip past this post. Hard as that may be given the length.

The video opens with a voice over from Nicole talking about how she's been hired for $10,000.00 to steal some computer files from her work and she's there after hours to get the job done. She then saunters into frame wearing a SKIN TIGHT white dress. She's an incredible looking Asian woman with big beautiful tits practically bursting through her outfit and long luxurious black hair. We get to watch as she sits down at a computer and intently starts looking for the files she needs. She gives him her ID number and he calls it in while keeping his gun trained on her pretty head. After a short phone conversation, he hangs up and tells her that the ID checked out, but her office is on another floor, so in his words: 'What the FUCK are you doing here?!?'

He then cracks her on the head with his gun to show he means business. She instantly begins pleading with him that she was told to come here and get some files as a favor.

Max isn't buying it and gives her another good crack to the skull, sending her careening to the floor. He wastes no time, and cuffs both of her hands behind her back. All the while Nicole is pleading for him to stop. On a side note, the acting from both Max and Nicole is FANTASTIC here and throughout the entire film. I'm not kidding. Max plays this with just the right amount of cold detachment, and Nicole is a good enough actress that she could probably be in actual films, because she sells all her emotions and dialog like it's really happening. There isn't a single sour note in either of their performances.

Anyhow, Nicole continues to plead that she's telling the truth and that she's done nothing wrong. Max is so frustrated by this, he actually moves the desk to give himself more room, and then begins kicking her in the stomach over and over while screaming: 'You ready to tell the fucking truth?!?' This is where John Marshall's finely honed directing skills come into play, because he expertly films this beating by not ever actually showing any contact between Max's military boots and Nicole's gorgeous stomach.

As we all can attest, trying to show that RARELY comes off good, because 99 times out of 100 it's blatantly obvious how fake it is. Not here because John uses angles and camera jerks at just the right moments, so between that and the sound of Nicole's pitch perfect grunting and crying with every foot fall, the scene comes off INCREDIBLY believable, and HOT AS FUCK!!!! As Max continues to kick the Hell out of the exquisitely squirming a screaming Nicole, her dress begins to ride up revealing her perfect ass and MOUTHWATERING pussy. Max even stops the beating for a moment when this happens to admire how incredible it looks. He's right back to it in moments though, as he begins kicking and stomping on her from the other side.

All the while Nicole is grunting, screaming, and crying with every blow, and I gotta say, if you're into this type of material, and you don't have a raging hard on by this point from the sound of Nicole's screaming alone, well then, you're not really into this type of material, because I couldn't get enough of it!!! Eventually Max picks her up off the floor, throws her against the wall, points his gun into her left tit, and screams: 'TALK!!' She cries back that she already told him everything and if he doesn't believe her, he can go to Hell.

Well, as you can imagine, that doesn't go over well with Max, who begins beating her the good old fashioned way, with his fists. Ya gotta love a good old fashioned.

Once again, perfectly filmed by John Marshall with cuts, camera jumps, and Nicole's SMOKING hot yelling all edited together masterfully. It's not long before Nicole can't take anymore of this, and slump to the floor, with her gorgeous snatch still tantalizingly exposed. Max doesn't pause to admire this time though. He quickly puts his gun in her mouth and waits a few moments for the horror of the situation to wash over Nicole.

He then gives her one last good crack on the skull with the butt of his gun knocking her out cold to the floor. DID I MENTION HOW FUCKING HOT NICOLE IS THROUGHOUT ALL OF THIS, AND WE'RE ONLY 6 MINUTES INTO A 30 MINUTE MOVIE AT THIS POINT!!! Max then drags her off, and we fade to an exterior shot of a warehouse he's taken her to. The next shot is inside Max's personal torture lab, and he's already firmly tied the recently beaten unconscious Nicole's feet to a chair, and secured her hands to ropes attached to a frame above her designed for just this purpose. Nicole is still out, and the camera admires her from various angles as we hear Max in the background on the phone telling someone he just caught her spying, and he doesn't know what she was looking for yet.

He then picks up one of two syringes containing adrenalin to wake her up and keep her alert, and delivers it into her left tit. She's still so out of it that she barely responds to the needle. Max hangs back for a few moments while she becomes lucid. The camera again shows the stunning Nicole from various angles as the haze in her head clears, and she eventually comes to and realizes the situation she's in. She starts yelling at Max to let her go, and that she's gonna file a lawsuit against this place as soon as she gets out of here. Like that's gonna work) Max calls her a cunt and tells her she's not going anywhere followed by some more good old fashioned fist work to the head and body, while asking her what she was looking for. I just want to point out, as the above photos show, while this is graphic enough to get the point of what's happening across, it doesn't become so graphic as to seem totally real.

Only real enough to pass the illusion to your head and penis that something EXTREMELY FUCKING WONDERFUL is happening in front of you, and how much you can't wait to see what comes next, and hot damn, what comes next is FAN-FUCKING-TASTIC!!!! So after Max finishes taking time with her fingers, and she still hasn't told him anything other then to scream 'STOP', he tells her she may be thinking her fingers will heal eventually.

He says: 'Maybe I need to inflict a little permanent damage. Something that's NEVER GONNA GROW BACK!' She continues weeping as Max places the pliers on Nicole's gorgeous right nipple. He holds it there for a moment, and then begins to slowly SQUEEZE!

This is an INCREDBILE effect that John Marshall pulled off on this shot, because it looks fucking AMAZING. The camera stays on Nicole's tit and blood begins squirting through her shirt and over the pliers and down her chest. I only counted two quick camera cut always that you barely notice, one being to her face. Of course the AMAZING music coming out of Nicole's mouth as this is happening has to be heard to be believed. As I said, she truly is a really good actress, and she sells this scene from the bottom of her soul, SCREAMING LIKE MAD!!! Good lord, I could listen to her scream for days!!! So, right when you think the special effects couldn't get any better, YANK!!!!

OFF COMES HER RIGHT NIPPLE! So after my refractory period was over, I came back, and Max isn't done with the pliers yet. Nope, her left nipple is still awaiting its treatment, and what a wonderful rinse and repeat this was! This one is just as, if not more impressive than the last one, because this time he doesn't just squeeze the pliers, he twists them as well, and it's really incredible to behold. Nicole's screaming gets even MORE shrill than before, and blood begins a slow trickle to a fast stream as the pliers do their wonderful work, and then, as the last time YANK! OFF COMES HER FUCKING NIPPLE!!!

Fuck, this is a wonderful movie. Any guess what my final score is gonna be? So Max lets her sit and cry for a few moments as the camera allows us to admire his handy works. You gotta respect a guy who know how to use tools this well. Then, right when Nicole thinks it can't get any worse, Max shows her yet another sensitive area the pliers are just itching to go, which of course is right between her legs, and HOT DAMN her reaction doesn't disappoint. The screams start coming, the blood begins flowing, and not just on screen if you know what I'm saying!

This is finally all Nicole can take, and she passes out from the ordeal. But not for long. After a quick fade to black, we come back and Max has FIRMLY secured the unconscious Nicole to an X-Frame. Her feet are held in place by metal rods placed around her ankles and her wrists are tightly tied to a cable that can be manually tightened behind her, but more on that in a moment. Max has also thankfully taken the time to shred her dress even more so we can get a better look at what's still on offer from Nicole. Of course he left her sexy high heel shoes on because that's what anyone in their right mind would do.

Max then takes this quiet time to prove how absolutely right minded these PKF films are, because he use's a pair of scissors to cut away even more of Nicole's dress. As my motto says, 'Get'em naked, or don't waste my time.' Hat's off to you PKF. Brings a tear to my eye. And other stuff as well.

Kick & SCREAM she does. I swear, if PKF released an MP3 of just Nicole screaming, I'd buy it because she's so fucking AMAZING at it. She just keeps shrieking: 'I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING! I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING!' Eventually Max decides it's time to move on, and he hits a switch that slowly raises the X-Beam so Nicole is closer to standing than laying down. Time for the next round of fun! As Max so eloquently puts it: 'Time to cauterize those wounds.

We wouldn't want you bleeding to death, now would we?' He really is a caring guy.

So HOT IRON time it is! Again, the special effects here are OUT STANDING! From the orange glow of the metal, to the smoke rising off Nicole's cooking flesh, this is the cock throbbingly WONDERFUL stuff we all pay to see done SO well in PKF productions, and this scene doesn't fall short in the least.

Now, I know I've gone on AT LENGTH about what an AMAZING screamer Nicole is, but I'm not kidding here, she actually cranks it up EVEN FURTHER in this scene. I'm betting she had a sore throat for weeks after this because, fucking CHRIST, can that girl SSSSSSCCCCCRRRRREEEEEEAAAAMMMMMMM, and that sound goes RIGHT to your penis!! Hell, I wish I could take her scream and manifest it into raw material and make my bed out of it so I curl up and sleep in it every night.

Okay, that didn't make any sense, but YOU KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT!! And the SCREAMING and burning continues!! So, as always, all good things must come to an end. Nicole once again passes out from all the fun Max was having. Kind of inconsiderate of her, huh? But what to do now?

Max already used both the adrenaline shots. How do we continue this wonderful show and make sure Nicole is awake to YELL HER FUCKING HEAD OFF and GET OUR DICKS HARD?

Well, remember Max is a guy who's prepared for any situation. So if you don't have any spare adrenaline, just beat the fuck out of her with a pipe! See, how easy and fun that problem was to solve?!?

Of course we can't have her limping away on one leg, so Max makes sure to take the other one out as well, and then begins flailing away with the hammer on her torso as well, leaving bloody marks all across this amazing canvas! WHAT AN ARTIST THIS FUCKING GUY IS!! Again, this is ALL done with very clever editing and camera work by John Marshall. You never see a single blow land, but with the hammer on flesh sound and the way the camera moves, coupled with the ever present wailing of Nicole, perfectly timed to each hammer fall, the scene is WONDERFULLY fun and SMOKING FUCKING HOT!!! Eventually, Max gives her a crack on the head, and then reigns down a few more blows on her torso with the hammer. That quiets her down a little, but Max has another tool sure to illicit more of those cock hardening screams from Nicole.

Sure, anyone can stab someone with a knife, but why be so clean about it when you can be like Max and use a long blunt Phillips head screwdriver instead? So Max then makes one last stab with the screwdriver right through Nicole's right tit, and has some fun shaking it around while it's still in there. When he's finished with that, he goes back yet again to one of the old stand by's, and strangles her with his bare hands. That's just fun good for everyone!

Now that Nicole has departed Max gets on his phone and tells the Clean-up Crew they have a job to do. He hangs up and begins to untie her, but it turns out she's playing possum, because every now and then, she keeps opening her eyes when she doesn't think Max is looking. Max lifts her off the X-Frame and places what he thinks is her lifeless corpse on the ground and leaves the room. Nicole had seen Max put his cell phone on the table across the room and wastes no time pulling her naked battered body across the room to get to it, leaving a big trail of blood in her wake, and yes, that's just as amazing to watch as it sounds. After flailing away with her broken fingers, she finally manages to pull herself up to the phone, dials a number, and starts begging the person on the other end for help. Little did she realize that Max had crept back into the room, and he'll now have the phone number of the person who hired Nicole on his phone, so she truly has outlived her usefulness to Max at this point, but not for us, because Max is gonna make sure she goes out in proper PKF style.

So first he cracks her on the skull with a wooden club to end her phone call. After Nicole crumbles to the ground, Max gives a few more kicks to those huge funbags on her chest for good measure, and then proceeds to strangle her to death. Not with his hands or even a rope, but with barbed fucking wire!! This time, he makes sure the job is REALLY done. This movie gets a fucking A+ from me.

Hell, if there was a higher score than that, I'd give it. Everything about this flick is a home run. From John Marshall's directing and editing skills, to Max Coxxx's unwavering bad guy we all wish we were, to the fucking ASTOUNDING Nicole Oring! What a find she was for this film! She's strikingly gorgeous, actually has REAL acting ability, can and will SCREAM like no one's business, and on top of all that is willing to make fucked up movies like this one to satisfy perverted fucks like us.

WHAT A WOMAN!! Howie 1370) Covers. Howie: Thanks for the great review of Deadly Interrogation III. Can't say you didn't warn us. Your review and the movie itself have all that this GIMPER could hope for --- except the particular peril that the young lady encountered. Personally I would have raped the crap out of her in lieu of the dismemberments but.

That's just me. Other than that the movie has at least some semblance of a plot, a good-looking woman, hands behind the back (for awhile) and plenty of info about how to acquire the product. 1373) Dr Yuya. Howie: Excellent work on the review of Deadly Interrogation III. And the large caps are top notch. It's not hard to tell when you have found a film that you enjoy. I was OK with the length of the review but I don't share your enthusiasm for exclamation marks.

They tend to remind of a wienie named Bondage Dave, who some of us used to argue with on another short-lived forum because he was always WRONG!!!! In any event, my take is the same as Dr. Nicole Oring is a stunner but I'm a GIMP Lightweight and this isn't really my kind of film. Nonetheless, I appreciate all your efforts putting the review together. 1375) Dan Hawke. Covers: Yep, that was the magazine, 'Shock Mystery Tales'.

Because of the depth of content I always wondered if the stories were original or if they were reprints. However, out of the 100's of magazines I had at the time, all of the Shock Mystery Tales stories seemed unique to me. As I said, this was a digest size magazine, similar in size and style of Reader's Digest. If anyone has any of these actual mags (I think there were only 6-9 issues of this digest) I would love to see these MAM stories in the MAM section. Ralphus, I'm sure I noticed the search feature once upon a time, but didn't even recall it was there as I asked for it to be added!:/ duh. ~Dan' 1376) Silvio Dante. Yeah I also felt the review for the Nicole Oring movie was a little over enthusiastic and.assumptive.

It's fairly obvious it is isn't a general thumbs up kind of film that will be collectively loved by everyone here because we're all 'sick fucks' who should be expected to eat stuff like this up. It's clearly very hardcore and niche and will have only an appropriately niche audience if anything. The review doesn't paint this picture at all.

But I do realize.this IS all the reviewers opinion. No matter how presented, it adds something to the forum that's informative and wasn't here before.so it can only be a good thing. 1378) A Canadian.

Yuya wrote: It's clearly very hardcore and niche and will have only an appropriately niche audience if anything. The review doesn't paint this picture at all. I can't say I agree with that. I thought it was pretty clear that this is a film for the mangle-heads.

Actually, the fact that it was bankrolled by Fritz was the first clue. Perhaps I should add that my comment about the exclamation marks was very much tongue in cheek.

Since Howie wasn't around in the Bondage Dave days ( unless he was lurking), he may not be familiar with that annoying goofball's ridiculous use of exclamation marks ( the number of exclamation marks would vary) at the end of almost every sentence he wrote. Here's my hope: Now that Rick is producing films again, maybe we'll see Nicole in a future ZFX film.

That would be exciting. Dr Yuya said: Yeah I also felt the review for the Nicole Oring movie was a little over enthusiastic and.assumptive. It's fairly obvious it is isn't a general thumbs up kind of film that will be collectively loved by everyone here because we're all 'sick fucks' who should be expected to eat stuff like this up. It's clearly very hardcore and niche and will have only an appropriately niche audience if anything. The review doesn't paint this picture at all.

Hmmm, I'm guessing you were a little over enthusiastic and.assumptive and just skipped that entire first paragraph of the review. Here, I'll re-post it again for you. Okay, right off the bat, this one is gonna be too brutal for some of you in here.

That I PROMISE, but I fucking LOVED it! Just picked it up yesterday, and was so taken with it I had to do a review. So if it's not your thing, well then, I don't know what to tell ya. Skip past this post. Hard as that may be given the length. ============= @ Canadian - Yup, I actually was lurking then and got the reference.

1380) Thomas Chaser. I, for one, really enjoyed Howie's review of 'Deadly Interrogation 3' for a number of reasons. Gog said: Though a lot I've found are really good, an awful lot never really live up to the expectations. Glad you found one that hit's the spot for you.

Couldn't agree more. All the stuff over on Nicheclips is SUPER hit or miss, and there are FAR more misses than hits. That's why this one really lit my bell, because it actually delivered on everything it promised, which as we know, isn't always the case, as a whole shit load of movies I have that I'll never watch again can attest to. This one however goes in the special FUCKING AMAZING folder, for me at least. ===== @ Thomas Chaser - Believe it or not, my instincts were actually correct. Not that she's been in any major films, but she actually has a pretty long IMDB page filled with B-Movies and TV shows.

So no, she's not Meryl Streep, but she's got more actual acting credentials than most of the chicks over at Nicheclips, for sure. [] Ya, I wasn't crazy about the tats either, but I find some girls hot enough to pull them off, as long as they don't go INSANE with them, and her hotness overcame my annoyance of the tats in this case, but as with all things, your mileage may vary.

Also, echoing both your and Canadians comments, I'd LOVE to see her in a ZFX flick. Hell, I'd watch her in just about anything at this point, but dam, I think that would be an outstanding match-up! Howie 1383) Ralphus. Howie: I really enjoyed reading your review of Deadly Interrogation III.

Probably the most enthusiastic review I've read in a long time. One question though.what did you actually think of the movie?

Was it good, bad, somewhere in between? Because I couldn't really tell. Maybe the refractory period comment might have been a clue, I dunno. I've seen the movie, and I agree, it's for a very limited audience. Fritz is the one behind it, that should be a clue it's going to be way over the top. This is the same guy who pays for disembowelment customs.

I gave it a try, but it honestly didn't do anything for me. Nicole Oring is a pleasant-enough looking Asian woman, but I didn't like the tattoo over her pussy.

If I were Max, I would have taken the hot iron and sizzled that part off in the first 5 minutes. But really bothered me was the huge amount of blood in this one, which got so bad it just became ridiculous after a while. No woman is going to still be pretty if it looks like she's swimming in barbeque sauce. I've said it before, but it holds true every time, and especially in a film like this. The key is distress, not mutilation.

Here's the direct link for your latest review, maybe the first review you've written here in over 10 years: ----------------------------------------- TRG asked: Regarding your unnotated photo of the AT&T supervisor, is this a hint that you have a Jones for the fully-equipped Milana Vayntrub as GIMP? I have the hots for her, period. It's unlikely she'll ever do any kind of serious GIMPage; she's a comedic actress.

But what's not to love? Sweet face, understated killer body, and that girl-next-door appeal that's very attractive.

Plus that, she's funny! She's got dozens of humorous videos on YouTube. The following vid isn't really on-topic, but it made me laugh. Gimpers, two things of note from Newsoftheweird.com that you all might find of note.

First, The Canadian Radio-television & Telecommunications Commission in March reprimanded three pornography broadcast stations -- not for excessively erotic fare, but for violating Canada's protectionist, patriotic rules requiring that at least 35 percent of all content be of Canadian origin. According to its notice, the 24-hour AOV Adult Movie Channel, XXX Action Clips and Maleflixxx were falling short of the 8 1/2 hours a day of north-of-the-border sex action (and, in an additional charge, were failing to provide enough closed captioning to accompany the 'Yeah's' and 'Oh, baby's'). [National Post, 3-5-2014] Second, From England: -- England's Stockport magistrates' court levied the equivalent of a $13,000 fine in March against Lorraine White, 41, who runs a part-time service as a dominatrix (chaining up and whipping 'bad' men) in a 'sex dungeon.'

Her business is apparently perfectly legal; the citation was for violating fire codes because inspectors could not see how a client, being properly disciplined (handcuffed and chained), might escape the dungeon in the event of fire. [Manchester Evening News, 3-13-2014] Bureaucrats. 1386) Covers. Silvio Dante wrote: Regarding the men's magazine inside illos that have been posted, not all look like John Duillo's work. Some are certainly his, but others appear drawn by others, equally professional, of course.

Duillo rarely signed his art, especially the inside illos. I really haven't studied Duillo's style versus his contemporaries to be able to spot his work on my own. I am dependent on the labeling of scans by others.

At least I can do the math for Ralphus' AntiBot Test on my own. Non-Duillo of the Day: Battle Cry Sept 1958 interior.jpg 1387) Covers. Hi, All, Regarding 'Deadly Interrogation III'. I have to agree with Ralphus. There is too much 'action'; no human being would resist that without falling into a state of shock which would render him/her useless for the main purpose which is getting information.

Unfortunately, I see that it is a common trait in the very few 'interrogation' clips around. All the 'DI' series have the same style; also 'The Serum' (of which one 'DI' seems to be an offshot). Real interrogation is much more restrained and self controlled (two guys blindingly hitting an AOH tied blonde with metal objects will most probably kill or render the subject useless fairly soon) I have seen the caps for a clip called 'Her Her Mud' which seems much more realistic (though it also ends with the customary strangling). When I write something I use to always make the 'over the top' check. And sometimes think the end result, though realistic, might be found a bit boring or plain. Regards, El Wananchi 1390) Sloth.

Here's a new Arcas thing. Simple, but I just needed to open the throttle a little.

And it's sorta-kinda for Bill K who always wants me to make 'em sweat I just finished up my Merrick story for BDSMartworks so I needed to dip my toes in slightly darker water. For those who don't like blood, just consider her a really messy eater of strawberry jelly sandwiches Howie, thanks for that great and enthusiastic review of DI3. I'm a fan of the series and this one seems to live up to the others. I'm not always into such gore, but once in a while I enjoy the 'over the top' stuff. Like reading a Zerns comic. Much appreciated.

Again, happy B-Day and you don't look a day over 661 1392) Blakemore. Matt wrote: The Canadian Radio-television & Telecommunications Commission in March reprimanded three pornography broadcast stations -- not for excessively erotic fare, but for violating Canada's protectionist, patriotic rules requiring that at least 35 percent of all content be of Canadian origin. According to its notice, the 24-hour AOV Adult Movie Channel, XXX Action Clips and Maleflixxx were falling short of the 8 1/2 hours a day of north-of-the-border sex action (and, in an additional charge, were failing to provide enough closed captioning to accompany the 'Yeah's' and 'Oh, baby's') Let's remember this is also the country where something called the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council issued a ruling against a radio station for playing the Dire Straits song, Money for Nothing (it has the word 'faggot' in it). Most notably, the ruling was issued more than 25 years after the song was released []. 1397) Blakemore. Ralphus said: what did you actually think of the movie? Was it good, bad, somewhere in between?

Because I couldn't really tell. Maybe the refractory period comment might have been a clue, I dunno. Ha ha, go big or go home I always like to say. As far as the mutilation and blood are concerned in the film, I don't expect, nor would I want it to look totally real, and as I mentioned in the review, it didn't look real enough to gross me out, just enough to create a fantasy environment. I think the film does a WONDERFUL job of showing a fantasy scenario where a FABULOUS looking woman in placed in a completely helpless situation, and the hero of our tale gets to do to her what ever he pleases.

Oh, and of course he gets her naked. That's very important to me, in case you haven't picked it up from the other 1,000 times I've typed it. I didn't feel the blood went to ridiculous levels at all, as I could admire Nicole's wonderful shape the whole time. Even her nipples being ripped off didn't actually affect anything from and aesthetic perspective for me, as all they did was apply some blood makeup to her nips. Her tits still looked mouth wateringly delicious the entire time, as I think the screen caps show.

To me, these films are no different than the artwork from places like Drawing Palace or the photo's placed in here daily. It's all just fantasy. The only time I don't like excessive blood or gore in on of these flicks is when it gets to a point that it actually does obscure my view of the model, and in my opinion that never happened in this flick. Just good old GIMP action, the way I like it. Naked and helpless. Everything a growing penis needs.

========== @ El Wananchi - While I can appreciate your need for proper interrogation techniques, or the true limits of physical endurance, I don't think fantasy snuff films are really the place you should be expecting to see that. Not really the point. ================ @ Ralphus, I know you're probably gonna say it's something you picked up a long time ago, and don't know what it's from or even where you got it from, but I hope you know where this daily pic came from, because it looks hot as fuck! I'd LOVE to see more! Howie 1400) Howie.

A Canadian: I wonder if anyone's told those bureaucrats that Vancouver, Toronto, or Montreal don't produce as much material as, say, L.A., Vegas, or Amsterdam, (to give three examples). Probably not. I did notice while watching Lingerie on Cinemax that this softcore show was produced 'with assistance from the Ontario film commission.'

Wonder if they knew what the production was all about, and if they had second thoughts. A complaint about a song 25 years after it came out? Down here, the FCC wouldn't give a complaint about one word in the song the time of day.

* * * * * A Canadian wrote: I thought it was pretty clear that this is a film for the mangle-heads. Actually, the fact that it was bankrolled by Fritz was the first clue.

I don't even know what that means, so I'm not sure whether to be offended or not. It certainly doesn't sound very flattering, and the connotations well, I can't say the term is going to keep me on the invite list to the Royal Gallery at Ascot. Between you and Ralphus, my formerly spotless rep is being pummeled into possum pulp. You'd think I was Vlad the Impaler – who, BTW, contributed so much to society but will only be remembered for skewering his enemies on wooden pikes. It's not like everything I bring up here is about blood, guts and gratuitous scenes of mutilation.

I have my mellow side too. Like many of my fellow GIMPers, I'm a big fan of those MAM covers and have even restored some of the inside spreads. Tame stuff, no? Jeez you eviscerate a dozen female rebels and skin a few PETA protesters alive, and that's all anyone remembers.

The Poll: I've been trying to avoid this one, but since I'm here, I suppose it's time to weigh in To all those who responded by saying “keep things like they are because if it ain't broke don't fix it”, allow me to retort what is your fucking problem? Oooohh look, I can insert a smiley face here. Couldn't do that six months ago, when everything was also not broke and not in need of fixing. Frankly, with this attitude, we'd still be riding around on horseback because, well horses get you from point A to point B, so why improve on something that's working just fine? People there are reasons to enhance and advance BEFORE everything has fallen to bits and gone to hell in a hand basket. Here's the thing: Amy's awesome upgrades to this forum clearly have generated a lot more activity (which in itself should tell us something).

And a lot more effort on my part (and I'm sure others as well) to keep up. In general, this is a good thing. But to be honest, I no longer have the time to read every incisive dispatch that shows up here. Again, I'm sure others – apparently very quiet types who are not daily contributors – share my sentiment. By adding the simple feature of a topic for each post, a modicum of organization would be introduced to the board. This would allow sorting by threads (heresy!) and make it easier for those so inclined to ignore material (like the riveting and completely on-topic net neutrality discussion) in which they have zero interest.

But but but then people won't read everything I write! They'll skip over my carefully constructed, enlightening missives and overlook my sage comments!

Guess what, kiddo they're not reading them now – it's just a bigger pain to sift through the chaff when it's buried in a slew of seven unrelated topics in a single post. Trust me, there's a reason why 98% of discussion forums are threaded. It's because they are more convenient, more efficient, and on the whole more usable for all but those anal types who like to read every last word that went up in reverse chronological order since the last time they visited (probably thirty minutes ago). And for those who insist on reading all the latest all the time tell me how a topic driven, threaded layout would prohibit this. I'm sure there is even a way to “unthread” the forum and have it appear much as it does today. Folks still using Windows 95™ will always find a way to soldier on.

But why hamstring progress just to ensure the lurkers and less frequent visitors are bullied into muddling through a haphazard chain of posts which lurch you from one unrelated topic to the next at random? Honestly, I just don't get it. And if the best you can do is chant “if it ain't broke blah, blah, blah”, please sell your SUV and run appaloosa run! By the way, along with threads, modern board software also offers additional features still to arrive here.

Amy's upgrades have been wonderful, but by going just a bit further, we could also introduce auto-quotations (to reference text in other posts), hot-links (without entering the HTML manually) and editing features which would allow modifications to your own posts after they have been submitted. But why should I even mention such esoteric options? Everything is just fine as it is. Don't get me wrong. I'm not suggesting to take the board down for another month to make changes like this but the next time the opportunity arrives to move ahead, let's go for it, threads and all. 1408) Covers.

Fritz, It’s pretty clear that you advocate strongly for threaded format and your reasons for doing so are understandable and clearly articulated. But I have to take exception with your assertion that those who prefer the Guestbook format are somehow Smith Corona types who are wedded to the past. To me, one thing that distinguishes those who prefer one format over the other might be how we visit this great site and take advantage of what it has to offer. I for one am currently visiting infrequently, 2-3 days a week for only a few minutes.

Viewing the most recent posts, regardless of their topic, simply works better for me at a glance. If there is a topic that is clearly part of an implied thread, it is not difficult for me to scroll down and find it. That you have a different perspective is certainly your right, but to suggest that anyone who disagrees is married to the past is a stretch. And as for the term manglehead, no need to troll for insults there. Consider it a descriptive compliment, such as Deadhead or Metalhead. Violent disfigurement works for you and you have paid the man for the opportunity to enjoy it.

Good for you. Howie & Ralphus: The daily pic from the other day 'Camp Ravishment.' Is definitely the work from Subspaceland.com. Check out the site. There is some good stuff there, but Howie, I think you'll find it too soft for your tastes. Ten years ago this site would have been a must have as it combines bondage & sex.

However with Sex & Submission, Sexually Broken, etc. The bar has been raised high and SSL is very middle of the road. I joined SSL for a month as I did like some of their content and a lot of their models.

But the bondage, while at least competent, features big, thick ropes and is always derivative. I think I even mentioned this site previously here on the GIMP.

So check out the extensive previews of the site's content. In the end I'd have to say, great models, but the sex and bondage are pretty standard. Very little 'torture' is involved and is always pretty mild. ~Dan Hawke 1413) El Wananchi.

Hi, all, and especially Fritz, As you say, this is a fantasy environment, and such niceties as realism are not to be mandatory, as long as someone enjoys it. In fact, 'DI' clips are among the few I keep. I, for one, found more enjoyable the tension that it is created in a proper realistic interrogation than in the gory splashing of blood and. Freddie The Goldfish Game Card there.

Anatomical parts, so to speak, but that's me. Sometimes, even the simple line in a movie or story 'She was tortured. She talked', linked to a pretty girl, is all what I need for a pleasing moment. Besides, I have visited your Profile in DFN, and found particularly appropriate your attitude to the 'offline' environment.

El Wananchi 1414) MadBob. Badger wrote: But I have to take exception with your assertion that those who prefer the Guestbook format are somehow Smith Corona types who are wedded to the past. That was not my intent. If I was accusing anyone of being a Smith Corona type, it was the people who were supporting the guest book format with the “ ain't broke, don't fix it” argument.

That tired adage is just ludicrous. If we only made improvements to anything when anything “broke”, we'd still be living in the dark ages. I do understand why some people prefer the guest book format. What I don't get is why they would vote against a threaded board if an expanded, reverse-chronological layout could be an option as well.

All I'm suggesting is that contributors create (or reply to) a topic with their posts, and enable the forum to be sorted by these topics as well as by time and date as it is now. Is that so much to ask? @ Dan Hawke - Thanks for the heads up on Subspaceland.com. I even found the model from the pic Ralphus posted. She goes by the name Gina over there. It always amazes me how it's still possible a site like that has been around this long, and I'm just now finding out about it.

I actually think it looks pretty fucking great. The models they have over there are just stunning. I've been going through what's on offer, and have yet to see a clunker in the bunch.

With 41 pages of films and photo sets, it's a pretty safe bet I'll give'em a shot for a month. Thanks again. ---- @ Fritz - Interesting hearing some of the background on DI3. Like Ralphus said when he posted it, it's been over 10 years since I did a review in here, and certainly none of the ones I did back then were nearly as extensive as this one, and that's because I just found the flick to be fucking amazing. Don't worry, I know we're far from alone.

When I was trying to find a Image host for the screen caps I posted, I first put them up on my Dark Fetish account thinking that may work. It didn't, so I just kind of forgot about them, till my inbox started getting flooded with photo likes, and now the photoset has been viewed over 4,300 times since I posted it on Saturday night. So that's real Niche stuff, huh? There's over 100 screen caps from the film for those interested. Here's the link: [] 1418) BlueDog. Fritz I love your work.

Fact is I've purchased all the DI videos, and will most likely buy anything along the same lines. And that's after DI4, which IMHO didn't live up to the rest - mostly due to the model being not up to par as an actress. Maybe I'm just an especially sick fuck, but one thing I enjoy is having one movie be the soundtrack for another that maybe isn't up to par. In fact I find Blakemore's work perfect for this as many of Bondage Classics vids don't have a real soundtrack anyway. Another difference in tastes may also revolve around the fact that I don't care for gags.

Yeah, I know. Sorry folks, I know may don't consider it bondage without a gag, but I don't care much for them. I highly recommend DI 1 and 2 for those who liked DI3.

Any new work to look forward to Fritz? 1419) Ralphus. Howie: If you're interested, there are also a couple of reviews of Subspaceland videos in the Reviews section, by 2 different writers.

Both praise the beautiful models and both trash the dom who puts them through their paces, Marcellino. It sounds like the guy recruits very attractive women and then screws things up with his acting/direction.

Just a heads up if you're thinking of investing your hard-earned money on a membership. ----------------------------------- Fritz: The reason I had the poll on the threaded vs guestbook choice was because I really didn't know which would be best, and I wanted to get the other reader's feedback. I read some threaded boards, and I enjoy them, but I also like the open style we have here. I've been going back and forth, and now after what you mentioned about threaded boards is starting me to lean toward staying with the guestbook. You mentioned that threaded boards are more convenient, more efficient.and they also make it real easy to skip complete sections without even reading them. The most recent subject we had about Net Neutrality would have likely gotten skipped by 3/4 of the readers if we didn't have this format. Instead, it turned into a real interesting topic.

You can't deny that a threaded format practically encourages people to avoid a subject unless the header line is especially intriguing. That's a big turnoff for me. You could write a great post but unless the subject line wows people enough to want to click, it could likely be ignored. I'm the same way, on certain threaded boards I'll not even click if I don't recognize the name of the model in the subject line, for instance. If everything were right in front of me and I didn't have to click, especially if it happens to include a picture, I would be much more obliged to check it out. This is my own personal experience.

Still, you make a very convincing argument. The poll doesn't end until May 17, and anyone who voted for the guestbook format that wishes to change their vote can do so until then.

And the very quiet types who share your sentiments about the benefits of a threaded board.you still have plenty of time to vote. El Wananchi - Sometimes, even the simple line in a movie or story 'She was tortured. She talked', linked to a pretty girl, is all what I need for a pleasing moment. There have been many instances when things like that have floated my boat. People looking back at previous events can be very vivid: 'They spent several days working on her. By the time they finished she had screamed out every name she knew, telling them anything just to make the pain stop.'

Completely non explicit, but more erotic than a badly written detailed scene. I'm not bothered about 'real' realism - although it needs to seem real to me. So a babe tied in a way that means she could just escape is a no-no. As I've said before, I have no idea how much abuse a woman could take in real life, and I have no desire to find out, so it doesn't really matter if it's medically accurate or not. I don't like mutilation - burns, cuts, bruises and scratches are fine, but the nipple removing in DI3 is probably too much for me.

El Wananchi - you mentioned in an earlier post some caps from 'Her Her Mud' - have you got those? Or anything else you think shows a realistic interrogation? 1427) Covers. Amy had a great party for her birthday, she's now recovering still. She was also busy taking care of her new love, Mitsou, the kitty, who was abducted by aliens yesterday for a procedure no male likes to hear about. We're in full pre-production mode for the end part of Olalla, we're also busy with preparing Justine and if that wasn't enough work, we have two more productions in the work.

Our team has grown and we need to keep everyone on their toes. If I may put my two cents on the format? There's always room for improvement and growth, however, the forum, as it is, has been doing well for many years, the changes made by Amy only made it better.

To switch to a totally different format will cause many a nervous breakdown. I'll have more news later. Reine Margot wrote: Amy had a great party for her birthday, she's now recovering still. That sounds like. ----- The poll question: It's time to vote.

Although I think the outcome is looking clear, I'm going to vote for the threaded format. I'm not too worried about missing posts. Unless there's a huge increase in the volume of posts, I'm sure I can catch the new posts on a threaded format as well as I can now.

That said, I would prefer to have the subject matters in distinct threads. That would make it easier to track and respond to the comments on issues that are more important to me. 1436) Thomas Chaser. Howie - I joined Subspaceland for about a month or three and downloaded as much as I could, even waiting for new material to come out.

The stuff filmed at the Irish castle is good, and I particularly liked this model, who is also in 'Derailed' and goes by the name 'Allodia', which translates to 'Property' or 'Chattel'. All of the models are good, of course, but some are better than others in how they work the camera. One of my favorite sets is with Bara and Kristina bound to a rotisserie-style frame with candles burning underneath, so that whichever model is rotated face-down must bear the pain of being cooked by candlelight. It's called 'Cold Chills and Hot Thrills'. The rotisserie part is on the third reel, about 1/3 of the way through. Here's a series of screen caps from the aforementioned 'Hot Thrills and Warm Chills' (that's the correct name - I got it wrong earlier) rotisserie segment from Subspaceland.Com.

From what I can tell, this is the only time the rotisserie device was used by the studio, so maybe it was just on loan from somebody else. It appears on the third videoclip, about a third of the way through and goes to the end.

The story opens with Bara on top and Kristina underneath, facing downward. They're stripped nude and bound tightly to the frame, allowing them very little movement. Enter Marcellino, who fondles them a bit to test their bonds before the fun begins. As Kristina watches, he lights a series of small dish candles that line the foot of the device, inches from her body.

As he lights more candles, her discomfort from the heat grows stronger, and finally she begs to be rotated over, which causes Bara to now be subjected to the heat. As Kristina recovers from her ordeal, Marcellino brushes her body with oil, making sure to coat her breasts and pubic mound liberally. Meanwhile, underneath the device, Bara is now subjected to the candles' heat and begins to shift and pull at her bonds. Before her skin can blister, however, Marcellino rotates the frame, sending Kristina back over the flames. Now it is Bara's turn to be covered in oil as Kristina suffers terribly beneath her. Then, when Bara is sufficiently coated with oil, the frame is rotated and she is placed over the licking candle flames, much to the relief of Kristina who is now rotated to the top and away from the source of her pain. But her rest is only brief, for once again Marcellino loosens the nut holding the frame secure, and Kristina is slowly, painfully, rotated back over the fire.

She winces and shakes her head with pain, but she does not cry out. Bara, laying on top, knows that it is but a matter of time before she is rotated back over the intense heat. Will Kristina break first? Will Bara be subjected to the cruel torture of the candlelight?

Join Subspaceland and see! Or just ask me.

1441) Thomas Chaser. To answer your question, Howie, there's no dialogue in the film clips, which I suppose is done intentionally so that it can appeal to an international audience. I think it's made in the Netherlands but I'm not sure. The girls all appear to be Western European, or at least whomever handles the make-up and personal grooming issues is in touch with the EU vibe in porn. Anyway, because of the lack of dialogue, most of the interplay between the actors is done with facial expressions and grunts (and the occasional yell).

Is Marcellino a douche? Well, he's not afraid to fuck his models on camera unnecessarily. Personally, I'd rather not see another man's junk in my porn. I'd rather he kept his junk in its trunk and let the ladies handle any sexing that's going to be going on. Generally, the bondage is pretty much the same thing that you can get from Dan Hawke, HardTied.Com, or any other rope bondage guy. Marcellino uses mood lighting and some furniture and tries to give things an artistic touch, but generally it's no more harsh than anything else you've probably seen. You got your whipping, your clipping, and your clamps.

Hot wax and hog ties. A girl gets pissed on, another gets slapped around on the face, and there are plenty of AOH and spread-eagled scenes. The girls are all runway model-hot but overall the bondage doesn't really push any boundaries. Maybe the girls have limits (likely) or Marcellino just lacks imagination (also likely). You may find a scene or two or three you like, like I did, that would justify a one month's subscription, but after that.

Ralphus wrote: You can't deny that a threaded format practically encourages people to avoid a subject unless the header line is especially intriguing. Yes I can – and I will deny it.

Personally, if a topic looks even remotely interesting, I'll give it a try – but if the first post or two don't grab me, I won't wallow through the rest in hopes that things will turn around. A threaded layout makes it easy to ignore the remaining net neutrality posts once I realize this discussion is not for me (which it wasn't – ever – but I felt I read far more than I wanted to because it kept popping up like whack-a-moles in the middle of otherwise interesting material). My reaction was not, “gee, what erudite comments about such a non-GIMP related topic” but simply “this is annoying”. I know several folks who I persuaded to drop by here have left for this reason.

They won't see your poll, nor will the many who only check in here once in a while – the very people you want to encourage to participate more frequently. Note that virtually all the poll respondents are “regulars”. Of course the majority are comfortable with the way things are – that's why they're here all the time. But as someone who frequently complains that there is not more activity (especially from so-called lurkers), do you ever wonder why? Frankly, unless you drop by every day, jumping into a discussion at this place is like hopping on a merry-go-round that's going full tilt. Not very inviting for newbies.

Again, most of the people who voted to keep the current format appear to be daily visitors, based on post frequency if nothing else. Of course they have the time to keep up. But some of us are unable or unwilling to do so.

Personally, I wish I could read everything all the time, but I can't. When I return after just three days away and find 40 or 50 new posts, frankly, that's a bit overwhelming.

There's no way I'll go through all of those, so some kind of filtering must occur. Since I can't choose by topic (which would be most logical), I take the Badger approach and read as many of the most recent posts as time allows, or I will select based on author, images, first sentence or some other less reliable predictor of content. In any case, I will NOT be able to read everything, so one way or another, the net neutrality reports will fall by the wayside.

The only question is how much you want to irritate me (and others) by making this process more difficult than it needs to be. TRG trots out some numbers that indicate the GIMP now receives about 15 posts a day. Relative to the competition, that may be low – but (sorry) I follow the competition as well. In fact, during an average week, I visit over 20 discussion forums, including many that are non-fetish related. Most are much more active than this one. Thank god the others are threaded, or I could not possibly follow them all.

Why should the GIMP make things difficult for me (just in case I might be interested in net neutrality without knowing it) while everyone else makes it easy to filter content based on topic? Of course, you don't want to lose the regulars by, as Margot says, switching to a totally different format and causing the apocalypse oops, sorry, nervous breakdowns.

Well as DarknessMonger astutely points out (and as I have mentioned more than once), the format does not have to change – unless adding a topic line to each post is cause for panic. The layout otherwise would be identical in a non-threaded view (which could be the default). Only those who want a topic sort would see things differently. Think of it this way. Would you be happy rooting through your e-mail if notes arrived without a subject line?

By not enabling a topic field for posts, you are effectively restricting this feature here. To paraphrase Orson Welles, find me one other discussion forum that does not employ topics and topic-sorts (aka threads), and I'll go down on you. And if anyone is still reading at this point, especially you quiet types who agree and are on the verge of giving up on the place, vote goddamnit. Don't be misled by the status quo.

Choose progress. Just click on the “sign the forum” text and submit THREADS! As I will soon be going on a 4-day hiatus, this will be my last feeble attempt to sway the masses, which apparently are not as massive (or as vocal) as I would have thought. Oh well I tried. * * * * * BlueDog: Glad you enjoyed the DI videos. I agree the acting could have been better in DI4, but it's the ending in that one that has garnered the most criticism. It's scenes like that which likely cause Ralphus to spread all those nasty lies about me.

Still, if someone thought DI3 was too tame, they might want to give #4 a try. Recently, PKF released DI5. I had nothing to do with this one, but I did buy it.

It's less involved than the others, and to me it plays like a bit of a knock-off – but the heroine is attractive and it follows the usual formula. Not all my PKF commissions are as extreme or bloody as the DI series. If you like your interrogation scenes dialled down a bit, you might try What She Knows, Never Return or Cyborg Assassin (which has a pulp sci-fi theme). Teraz produced a first-rate custom for me called Interrogation of a Rebel Spy (available in two parts).

I also commissioned a few similar films from Casualties of Horror (on Nicheclips): The Serum (with Paris Kennedy) and a sequel, Sarducci Strike Again. Any of these should have at least some appeal for those who enjoyed the DI series. Here's my latest work, perhaps inspired a bit by that latest 'DI' discussion. I call it 'Awaiting Act 2'. Click for the bigger view, folks! Fritz, thank you for those fine commissions.

They're among my favorites in those stables. They really deliver a level violent drama that few others can make.

In a nutshell they're like those scenes in so many horror films. Only they DO take the turn our crowd wants to see;) MaX CoXXX, great work and I gotta say I'm REALLY psyched that Penny Pax is doing work with you now. Not only is she really cute and packing some wonder natural curves, but the girl can act! Maybe just about anyone I've seen in the genre. It's that or it's just that her face delivers such a convincing look. Either way I'd LOVE to see her in something as over the top and edgy as the Deadly Interrogation films, where her acting (and body!) can really shine. If only I could afford to spec a commission (*sigh*).

MadBob, good to see you posting more, bro! As Fritz said, don't be too put off if you don't get much/many/any replies. It's the nature of this forum for what we do, but it's clear that the contributions are appreciated.

At least it becomes more clear over time;) 1445) Reine Margot. Howie: Okay, I finally decided I'm gonna buy one of Amy's flicks, and think Maleficarum looks fucking fabulous, but I've got a question. There's a theatrical cut that's 108 minutes long, and a directors cut that's only 103 minutes long. Yes I know this has probably been answered a 1,000 times in here, but none that I've read. What's the difference between the two? The theatrical version of Maleficarum was made with a theatre audience in mind. There are more intercuts, it means that the torture scenes are cut more often.

There's a bit of additional footage, a bit longer, of the testimonies.The director's cut has less intercutting, which means less interruptions during the torture scenes. That's the difference. 1446) BlueDog. Fritz wrote: This would allow sorting by threads (heresy!) and make it easier for those so inclined to ignore material (like the riveting and completely on-topic net neutrality discussion) in which they have zero interest. Hmmm.I get it. You're using sarcasm. Like when you say 'riveting and on-topic,' you actually mean NOT riveting and NOT on-topic.

I don't know if I should reply in the same tongue-in-cheek manner, but I'll just come out and say that everyone here should be concerned about Net Neutrality. It may not have the same effect on your libido as talking about women getting their nipples burned off, but when it affects access to this site, and millions of other sites on the Internet, then yes, it is most assuredly on-topic. Sorry to annoy you, my friend. I know several folks who I persuaded to drop by here have left for this reason. They won't see your poll, nor will the many who only check in here once in a while – the very people you want to encourage to participate more frequently. Note that virtually all the poll respondents are “regulars”. Of course the majority are comfortable with the way things are – that's why they're here all the time.

Let's go back a few months, shall we? You wrote back in February 'It’s too bad the GIMP was down, or we could have had a vote on this. My guess is that most readers would have preferred the “threaded forum like Stakedamsels'. So we finally get settled in here and I decide to do a real poll and guess what?

Your side is getting clobbered, and it's my fault? Who else was I gonna ask? I can't poll the people who aren't here. I purposely ran the poll for an entire month so that those readers who only occasionally stop by here can cast their votes. Interestingly enough, even Stakedamsels himself came by and voted for our current system.

Since I can't choose by topic (which would be most logical), I take the Badger approach and read as many of the most recent posts as time allows, or I will select based on author, images, first sentence or some other less reliable predictor of content. In any case, I will NOT be able to read everything, so one way or another, the net neutrality reports will fall by the wayside. The only question is how much you want to irritate me (and others) by making this process more difficult than it needs to be. Yeah, I'm really trying to irritate you and everyone else who comes by here. You're on to me. I've already admitted I'm a sadist, and now you know like to inflict pain and suffering not just to women, but to my fellow pervs and sick fucks, too.

Why should the GIMP make things difficult for me (just in case I might be interested in net neutrality without knowing it) while everyone else makes it easy to filter content based on topic? Pick a topic.

Use our search function and do a search for, say, 'Deadly' for Howie's review and a bunch of entries come up all in one thread. Try 'Neutrality' (well, I know you wouldn't search for that, but somebody who actually cares about the future of the Internet might). Try 'Subspaceland' and everything comes up in one neat little package. It's not a perfect system, but what is?the format does not have to change – unless adding a topic line to each post is cause for panic.

The layout otherwise would be identical in a non-threaded view (which could be the default). Only those who want a topic sort would see things differently. I dunno, dude.

You say with a threaded board, we can make the site look exactly like it looks now? Not on any threaded board that I've seen.

I don't dislike threaded boards; in fact, I like them and I use them, but they are all separated into categories and everything is hidden unless you click on them and not all out in the open like we are. You say you visit over 20 discussion forums. Give me one, just one, that you would like to see us adopt as the template for this one. Seriously, I *want* to be proven wrong, and I'm very open to making changes that will improve the site and possibly increase visitors.

Seeing is believing. Maybe the huge majority who have voted for our current system just haven't noticed this much better system you're advocating. To paraphrase Orson Welles, find me one other discussion forum that does not employ topics and topic-sorts (aka threads), and I'll go down on you.

Unless you're an attractive well-built female, I'll pass on the going down part, thank you. But you want a discussion forum that's set up like we are and doesn't use threads?

How about the forerunner of this site, the PG-rated alternative to the GIMP,? I've mentioned it before, their discussion page is very similar in their set up to ours and they've actually been around 2 years longer than we have.

It's a great site, and very successful. And in all the years I've been reading it, I don't ever recall anyone complaining about how it's 'broken' because they don't use threads. I guess we get all the fun over here. 1449) A Canadian. Howie: Maleficarum's grinning guy did all the whipping, branding, binding Amy to the stake, one raping scene he did and even set Amy's pyre on fire. He got the best job ever of all jobs ever.

That why he is grinning. Howie, your 1452 post is very encouraging.

Glad to hear powerful money people are on our side. Fritz, the lurkers just look at the pictures and never make any comments at the Stakedamsels forum. The artists there get the same members responding to their posts the same as artists or story tellers or reviewers do here.

Having a threaded site doesn't make for more comment posts or great or bad site at all. It's the Gimpers that post artworks and pictures and reviews that makes the Gimp forum enjoyable to me. It's not going make any different to me if we go to threaded or stay the same. Whatever the end vote poll I am for. Amy's a new cat Mom. Remember Amy, dogs have masters and cats have staff or slaves. 1458) Mark Evans.

Re #1460 Covers It's probably a total coincidence, but the pen name of the author of the story is 'Andrew Blake,' which is also the 'stage' name of a well-known soft core porn film director known for using ravishingly beautiful actresses, often in mild - but sexy - BDSM settings. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Whereas before he and Lin had held the pitcher several inches above Ci-ci's body, allowing the water to cool slightly in its descent, this time Chiang held the hot pitcher flush against her breast. So that her protruding nipples, still aching from the Ox's savage blow, might feel the heat of the porcelain pitcher even as the steaming contents were about to baptize the shapely upper curves of her breasts.

But though the nerve endings in her inflamed nipples screamed at her to pull away from the pitcher's fiery touch, Ci-ci dared not back away. Was better than another breast-burning stroke from the simple-minded sadist with the strap. The Jade Pavilion, Chapter 42 1462) Ralphus. TRG wrote: You know what I can't figure out? One, why these men's magazine covers from the late 1960s, when the Cold War was raging and the Soviet Union was our arch-enemy, show Nazis, who were defeated TWENTY-THREE YEARS EARLIER as the villains. Nazis were easy targets.

They're universally reviled, and even better, they were largely out of power at the end of World War II, so it's not like they would have any representatives to step up and say, 'Hey, our party is being misrepresented unfairly in these magazines.' Two, how do these tortured women always have on such pretty lingerie? Where do you get attractively-colored, figure-flattering bras and panties in a war zone? I mentioned that earlier, and it still fascinates me. They don't really have to make sense.

It's not like these stories were based on actual facts. As exciting as it sounds, the Third Reich didn't really capture and torture a large number of American women during the war. The simple reason they are wearing things like lingerie and tattered clothing is because they knew women look sexy in outfits like those. If they could have gotten away with showing them nude, they would have done that, too. It was all about the bondage and showing beautiful women in various forms of distress. They knew what their money maker was. Oh, how I long for those days when it was perfectly okay to show women as victims in movies and on newsstands.

You can say we've matured as a culture, but some old-fashioned values will never go out of style. That's why these covers are still beloved many decades after they were originally published. ----------------------------------- Mark Evans wrote: Tasered in a bikini? An interesting way to raise money, I hope more women start doing this! Even if the money goes to charity, a hundred bucks is pretty steep to watch an attractive girl in a bikini get shocked for what was only just a few seconds. Take off her clothes and I would pay more. How about we wire her up like in this artwork and charge guys a fee to operate the control box?

How much would you pay to shock her for 30 seconds? How about for a minute? You could pile up the bucks real quick. How come no one has come up with this money-making idea yet? Ralphus wrote: How much would you pay to shock her for 30 seconds?

How about for a minute? You could pile up the bucks real quick. How come no one has come up with this money-making idea yet?

Ralphus, I'm sure it would be a very lucrative business. But I hope it never happens, because I would go bankrupt. If there was a model willing to take it, I don't even want to think about how much I would pay per minute. Using video game technology though, we are getting better and better at simulating this type of scenario though:) I've found others online, but here's a program I wrote that lets you electrocute a captive until she reveals a password: 1469) B. Elkcreek wrote: Does anyone know any sources for Giga DVD's, that are reasonable? I really don't want to pay 75.00. I can't do downloads on their site because they don't support MAC.

And frankly my computer is having some issues and not burning DVD's so I don't want to download. I'm looking for THZ-47. Heroinedvds (the femfight video sight out of China) use to have about everything for $15-20, but he took all his Giga down. Is suspect under legal threat. They really make their stuff hard to get.

That's too bad about Heroine DVDs. I used that site a few times myself.

I was actually surprised that the films I ordered from them made it through Canada Customs. Unfortunately, I never got around to ordering THZ-47, although I thought about it. If you're not able to download, I won't be any help. I know of a few sites where you can get the movie but they all require downloading. I do wish you well trying to find the film. It was one of my from last year, and I chose the star -- Miki Sunohara -- as the best actress of 2013 when I posted my year-end review in December. Gog: Yeah, that's Eufrat.

I had never heard of her until my friend Bob from Bob's Videos sent me a DVD so I could make vidcaps for him. I swear, this guy works with every hot model on the planet.

Unfortunately, it was just a softcore lesbian romp, something I have no interest in. But one of the models in the video was Eufrat, and I immediately dashed off an e-mail to him asking, 'Who is this babe???'

I agree, she's gorgeous. One of those women who's just way too cute to be a porn star. I haven't seen any of her bondage offerings, nor have any more from that daily picture, but she's apparently done some work for James Bertoni of, plus I found this photo set online. If you search around, you might find more.

She also did a video for that looks interesting. At least she's ballgagged and gets some whipping and clothespin abuse. One of our posters did a review of 4 of TNAV's videos and calls them pretty much inept on every level, though. And it's been my experience that generally, the prettier the model, the less extreme the material she'll allow herself to have done to her. So in her case, I would take whatever I could get. Hi, all, 'On Nazi Wartime Interrogation Practices' Probably this post will incense some, but believe me, it has some 'half serious' research and thought behind.

Of course, anyone is entitled to disagree. Take this as a disclaimer. Bill K., your post #1463 below prompted me to write something. Regarding this subject, 'unfortunately', the truth seems to be that they did not. It seems that there is a personal order from Himmler, as head of the Gestapo, dated in June 1942 (yes, that late) authorizing 'limited physical abuse' and admonizing that any Gestapo member with a sadistic tendency would be reprimanded.

This is not to say that this orders were obeyed to the letter, and probably “excesses” were the rule, but is useful to put everything into perspective (cited in “The Big Book of Pain. Torture and Punishment Through History”, Mark Donnelly and others –you can get it on Emule).

Then, and much to BDSM-lovers’ chagrin, neither the methods seem to have been at all sophisticated, neither the victims seems to have been women, in any significant proportion. The latter assertion is easily understandable. It was the 40s, and war, and guerrilla war, was a men’s thing, at least in the West (probably in the East, as partisan warfare was much more widely widespread, women took a greater part, voluntarily or not). There are surprisingly few recorded examples of female freedom fighters, less so SOE agents (much less OSS), to the extent that the well-known Odette Churchill case is paradigmatic, and that even serious movies on the subject are very few (and usually do not claim a real story background, except probably the one on the latter). Probably, one in fifty such freedom fighters was a female, if not less.

The first needs a longer explanation. Methods seem to have been completely unsophisticated, to the point of looking lame (if not at all less painful!). Guymanseven here (or G7 as you wish to call me)! I know I hardly come around here, but now that I have the time; I want to write about something I told Ralphus about some time ago. Of course we all know and remember the late great Lina Romay right?

She had one of the most stunning beauty to ever grace film. Part of this beauty, was that in her early career days, she had a nymph-child-like beauty inherent to most women 18 to early 20's. Well around the time Lina's career began, another pretty starlet begun her's. This back then young starlet was Tina Romero from Mexico (she was actually born in the states). Whom like the late great Romay, she had a child-like nymphistic beauty in her late teens; and worked on skin flicks lol. Of course maybe you all know her as the titular character from Alucarda. Besides Alucarda, she worked on other films where she graced us with her 'talented beauty' lol; but besides that film she really didn't do much GIMP stuff (not even in the Mujeres Salvajes movie where she is naked most of the time as well some female co-stars.

Though one of them did.) However, there is this movie which I believe is rarely heard of in the international erotic circles (or I might be wrong) called, Bandera Rota (translated to 'Broken Flag.' Yes it has quite a weird name). Done by Gabriel Retes (who was Tina's first spouse and also maker of Mujeres Salvajes).

It is a political thriller, oddly labeled as a dark comedy by his own creator. Retes is usually known to portray human cynicism in his films, as a way to show the 'true self of humankind.' Yeah he is way to much of a leftist intellectual-wannabe, but still places lots of skin in his pseudo-philosophical stories, which at the end it is what it sell and makes every one of us happy lol. Anyway, Bandera Rota starts with a bunch of film students working on a project in the Mexican woods (Tina Romero's character is part of the amateur film crew, and the main character; who is Tina's husband in the film seems to be a self-insert of Retes lol).

All of the sudden, they see a woman running away from a man; who precedes to gun that woman down. Some of the crew not only witness this, but also capture it on film. The murderer is an important politician, and the murdered damsel was his mistress who already had a family and a young cute daughter. There is worry among the young film crew on what to do about it, if to call the cops or something.

But their leader, Tina's husband decided to keep the film, and blackmail the politician by saying he would reveal the film unless there are socialistic changes in Mexican politics to benefit workers. Politician guy gets worried and while doing what told, also builds a team of investigators and goons; to be able to track down and hunt the blackmailers. In the film's climax, the hired mercenaries, goons and did I say torturers.? Find the film crew but without knowing, they kill first Ana's husband (Tina's character is named Ana now that I remember) and the rest of the crew is captured to use the interrogation and torture methods they use on them! Sadly they hang from his arms and legs a pantless male member of the crew and electrify his privates. I am sorry; I know we live in new times but that is not my thing. However; there is another female crew member (the crew's sole actress, Ana seems to be Director's Assistant) who is tied to a wall and being raped by one of the captors.

And Ana who is hanged from her arms, thrown a bucket of water at her to wake her up; and gets a punch in the gut as she is being questioned where the film is. And that is the last time Ana and her crew are seen in alive in 'real time' since at the movie's ending, since later we see the crime scene with the film dead crew and some men explain to the ones who hired them to know about this whole mess; how were the film student members were killed. Since they didn't tell anything where the film reel was, they had no other but to execute them by gunshots. Sorry but the guy hanged from his limbs looked funny when shot. Of course the women were killed too and while it was a quick flash back we see how Ana was gunned down. Both women released a piercing scream as a pointless effort to react to being executed, before their lifeless bodies would still be standing just because of the ropes holding them. Oh well I might as well place the scene of Ana's lifeless body hanging from the ropes, but there is no close up.

Love how her lifeless body is hanging there. Tina really is a great actress by pulling that. Wonder if she felt some discomfort like in Alucarda as it was said that during the fire in the climax of that film, she was basically suffocating but maybe I should leave that for another post if you guys wish since the source of that might need its own post. Though this post basically was to honor the beauty and talent of Tina Romero, but really that explanation would need another post for the nature of it. It might as well be a second post to honor her. So yeah, we only see nude damsels in distress at the end of Bandera Rota so not sure if I should even give it a rate or review.

What the hell! That doesn't mean Tina doesn't get naked throughout the film but they aren't GIMP scenes but I might as well show some of them. Halfway in the movie we get a hot shower scene. Where Ana is taking a shower with her husband as they argue about the happenings, and we get nice glimpses of Tina's small but nice tits, and that she was quite hairy and she had unkempt pussy and arm pits which gives a oddly sexy touch to her nymph-like body. Love how she washes around her body.

And finally, we have this quite candid scene; in which Ana's husband gets too stressed out, so as relief; Ana briefly shows her boobs at him. Quick but cute scene, which only exalted Tina's back then youthful beauty. I first discovered Bandera Rota, Mujeres Salvajes and many of Tina's and Retes' movies in the late 90's thanks to Mexican cable movie channels. Despite being Mexican films, they are/were quite hard to find in their own nation. (I remember seeing stocks of the VHS version of Mujeres Salvajes movies in store of the now dead Hastings chain, but was under age and didn't dare bought it lol). Bandera Rota got a DVD release in Mexico last decade (not sure if it got a US version), and managed to buy a copy around late 2005/early 2006 on a trip to the City of Monterrey, and found it at a MixUp store. MixUp is a media store chain in Mexico like the mentioned Hastings and Suncoast stores were (though not nationwide as this doesn't mean one can find a store easily in all of Mexico).

But you can't get a copy at the MixUp site either as it could be out of print, or most likely like most Mexican commercial websites; they are awfully crappy and don't list everything they actually sell (plus the way they are organized is dreaded awful). So I doubt you guys can get a copy in a similar way I did. So that is another reason I believe it is not worthy to make review of it. As far as I know, the only DVD release of Mujeres Salvajes was at Germany under its German translated title and with German dub. Around the web, one could find the Canal Once rip which at times airs in Mexico but no official home video release.

Anyway, as I said; this post was to honor Tina Romero and share my admiration for her with you guys. Who I usually compare with Lina Romay. Though still alive. Well I want to say that time came to Tina. Not saying she is less of a person but. Well you guys know.

At least we can go back in time and see her in her prime. Honestly, I wish I could go back in time to the times of these movies and feel every inch of her body lol. Honestly, she is a very warm person and loves her fans. But man, seriously beautiful women should not age! Though some get better with age lol. It is just that nowadays, Tina has a daughter who just got into acting named Cristina Mason.

And while many compare her to her own mother, there really is no comparison. Cristina is nowhere near as beautiful as Tina was back when they had the same age.

Not saying Cristina is not worth it as a person either; but really she can't compare to her own mother. Cristina has yet to do nude scenes, but doubt she will do the same things her mom did! Again, as I said, this whole post was to honor Tina. But if you guys wish I could make another post on Tina (most likely her films but not all are GIMP worthy), more about Retes' films which some do feature GIMP material, a post about Mujeres Salvajes or/and a post of what I said might need its own post and actually wanted to make in this post about Tina, but due to time reasons I was not able to talk more about. A documentary released on video in Mexico, about the Alucarda movie itself, called Alucardos.

Source of the information about Tina almost dying of suffocation in the film itself, giving a breathtaking performance (pun sort of intended). 1503) Joanna. @Bronx_Warrior: that's 'Black Ribbon' with Debbie D stripped naked and bound to the table for human sacrifice. Storyline is that a writer buys a typewriter possessed by a demon, which inserts itself into the writer's body and demands blood.

He gets a couple of accomplices to help him prepare her but (a) there's no sacrifice and (b) everybody dies, more or less. Acting is completely amateur, story idea had promise but was lost, and the only decent nudity is what you got in the vidcaps. Still, the scene where she's wiped down preparatory to her execution is good.

Too bad she's the only one to be sacrificed. @Guymanseven: Thanks for the lead on the film! I'll have to see if I can find it anywhere. @Joanne: Since you like good rack scenes, here's one from a movie called 'Blitzkrieg: Escape from Stalag 69', which is as bad as it sounds.

And yes, that is a giant chicken drumstick he's waving around. A Vida Do Bebe De Lamare Pdf Files. Apparently the fat Gestapo man likes a little dinner with his show. 1505) Joanna. Catching up a few posts.

Kelderek: Another fine work, thank you. The shaved pussy is a bit surprising coming from you, and it looks a bit inflamed, like maybe they whipped it first. Hey, a shaved pussy is a good excuse to stretch a bitch on the rack, like they needed a reason anyway. ------------------------------------------ Guymanseven: With all that information about the movie and all those caps, it seems kinda silly that you don't consider your Tina Romero post to be a review. We've certainly had reviews with less info than that. Give me a grade and I'll see if I can fashion it into a review for the site. It may be hard to find but obviously you have a copy or you wouldn't have been able to make all those caps.

I must say, she looks awfully hot in those topless AOH pictures. ------------------------------------------ Thomas Chaser: In case you didn't notice, we have additional stills on the abysmal torture rack scene in Blitzkrieg: Escape from Stalag 69 as well as the video link in both the Torture Rack Scenes Database and the Hot Iron Database, proof that a movie doesn't necessarily have to be good to be included in multiple databases. This one is so bad it appears to have been made in someone's basement with amateur actors doing an over-the-topic German accent. Pretty sad stuff.

------------------------------------------ TRG: Thanks for another fine review. I saw this film years ago.well, by saw, I mean I took it home and scanned through it hoping to see some legitimate Story of O action like in the first film. I thought it was pretty much a waste of time on that level, but obviously you had more tolerance with it than I did. In fact, I would say none of the follow-ups to the Just Jaeckin original film are worthwhile, with the lone exception of the 10-part miniseries with Claudia Cepeda. That's a movie that's badly in need of a DVD re-issue. The direct link for your latest review is here: 1511) A Canadian.

TRG: Excellent work on the amusing review of Story of O Part II. I particularly liked your summary of the hood ornament scene: (I)t's all there, and Mom, getting a lot more than she bargained for, is bawling her head off the entire time. Warms the cockles of your little heart. That makes me think of that old Woody Allen line, 'That's just great. Nothing like hot cockles.'

Anyway, that scene sounds like a winner but I'm not so sure about the rest of the film. I did enjoy the review, though. 1512) Joanna. I managed to get that torture game of Mark Evans' working, and it was pretty fun. But because it puts you in the role of the torturer and not my preferred role as the prisoner, it got me thinking about interactive torture games, and how they're much easier to make where the player is the torturer and not the victim. If the player is the torturer, they have a clear goal and clear options: make the prisoner talk using a selection of methods, and when they've broken down, you've won. And you can add more layers by having several prisoners, each with heir own strengths and weaknesses, so you need to find the right methods and the right questions to break them down, with an extra element of risk that they might die if you push them too hard.

But a game where you're the prisoner is more limited, because you're not really in a position to make many choices: you're being asked questions and you'll have pain applied to you until you answer them. And if you take the 2 classic torture scenarios, the witch hunt/inquisition and spy/military interrogation, then you're going to be facing execution at the end of the torture anyway, so there's no real win option. In my opinion, to make it work, instead of being focused on a clear goal like the torturer game, the victim game would be focused on how long you could last: you'd have some type of endurance meter that'd be worn down as you were tortured, and you'd need to pick the right options to the interrogator's questions to try and buy time and let your meter recover. You'll eventually have to confess, or die, but the fun would be in seeing how long you could hold out. 1513) Mark Evans. Joanna, thanks for the update.

This makes me think of an old game I bought called Spycraft I think. You do actually get to electro-torture a woman in a fashion that gets her to answer questions without killing her.

I think there are scenes in GTA 5 as well, but with a male. Your other point about being the victim is appreciated since I thought of the same thing, and of a way to make it happen for an electro scene. A program could easily send sounds to a stereo amplifier which you could wire up any way you'd like. Many people already do this for sexual stimulation.

There was a program called RXTC that even let an online person control the signals for online play. There are other programs, or pre-recorded wav files out there as well, for anyone interested in hooking themselves up to a stereo amplifier. This setup could easily provide a variety of sensations from a program.

The options for visuals are limitless. Maybe a 3D view of the torture room that you can look around in with the mouse? Or just a forward view of the torturer at the control box, so you can see him turning knobs and flipping switches. For someone who really wants to be electro-tortured, a program like this might be bit hit. I imagine you would calibrate it at the beginning to set your low, medium and high strengths, then the torturer would push you to your limits - and beyond if you refused to cooperate. If only I could find the time.

A Canadian, Ralphus: Thanks our your responses to the SO2 review. It's really not that bad of a movie, but I wouldn't pay the prices being asked on Amazon for it. I nabbed it for a couple bucks about a dozen years ago at a video store close-out sale. Like I said, put Story of O in the title and people will want to watch it. It's quite European, too. I like that part about it.

I'm also something of a completist when I get on a certain subject. The 10-part series is available on DVD, but only in a Region 2 version as far as I can find. Amy just on her she talks a bit about her most recent activities, including the upcoming projects. What she doesn't talk about is the recent inquiries she and I received from our fans concerning Maleficarum II. I mentioned before that there was such a plan. That is before Jac decide to take on the job of bringing De Sade's Justine to the big and small screens.

There's a clear phenomena here, Maleficarum is currently our best seller. The biggest we had so far bar none. So, why aren't we coming up with a Maleficarum II yet? I emphasize the word YET. I think it has to do with two or three issues that would have to be resolved. One, the story. Would Maleficarum II be a sequel to the first one?

With the same characters? Would Mariana and Francisca return for more tribulations and painful experiences? Or is it going to be a totally different story set in inquisition times? Another issue would be the cast. If it's not a sequel, we could bring many of the previous cast back.

But, who would be willing to be the victim or victims? How far would they be willing to go? Amy had the toughest experience with the now famous barbecue scene.

How can we match that? I don't have any doubts that the torture scenes Jac can come up with will be unique, intense and totally awesome, but who would be willing to be put through all that? It think the first Maleficarum is very hard to beat, however, it is not impossible.

Should we submit this to a poll? What say you, fellow Gimpers? Should we bring back Mariana and Francisca for more pain? Should we make a totally new story? I know there's one inquisition story being written, but that's a different matter altogether. 1519) Bill K. Maleficarum II with the same characters would not make any sense to me because there are so many true stories of dungeon torture and rape then bats (fiery endings) executions.

Why not create one of those true stories? Amy and Margot said Maleficarum's spit roast and bats events were made up, which was then added to the true story of Mariana and Francisca. Bring back the same actresses of course but with a different dungeon and bats storyline. Maybe add different true dungeon torture devices and methods?

Perhaps a multiple bats ending where both Amy and Mila burn at the stake together. The point is a sequel to Maleficarum I believe is an unnecessary gamble that you need not do. Just create another Maleficarum type movie and I am sure it will do at least well as Maleficarum and if the bats burning is better it will do better. That's my opinion. 1520) Galahad. You tease us! You must be teasing us!!

'Who (in a Maleficarum Mark II) would be willing to be the victim?' 'Who would be willing to be put through all that?' 'How far would they be willing to go?' Why, of course, our own dear heroine Ms. Our own masochistic exhibitionist who; I am sure as I write; is with excitement, devising, contriving, designing, building yet further ordeals for herself. It is true that she was a little wimpish about the roasting scene, but as I speculated many months ago, I am sure that the challenge and excitement of another similar, even more intense, experience will be irresistible for her. 1521) MR BUSH.

Net Neutrality update: To the surprise of absolutely no one, the FCC voted for a plan to kill Net Neutrality this afternoon by a score of 3-2, with all 3 of the yes votes being former workers for either Comcast or Verizon, including Chairman Tom Wheeler. So what that amounts to is ignoring the millions of signatures and just selling out, which no doubt will ultimately result in a large payout for them. I'm pretty frustrated over the whole thing, but what good is the will of the people when there's money involved? The rich get richer, the American people get screwed. I don't even want to talk about it.

Listen to this guy instead. All right, let's get back to actual tied-up women talk.

This other shit is too depressing. Maleficarum II: I honestly don't see how this could work. You can't do a sequel because the events of the first movie don't lend themselves to a sequel. What are you gonna do, stick Bobby Ewing in the shower again and say the ending of the first movie was all just a dream?

In theory, you could do a remake of the first movie, using a different cast and basically repeat the scenes in the sequel, like they did with Mark of the Devil Part II, taking measures to improve a couple of scenes that could have worked better the first time around, and I don't have to say which scenes those were. But the problem is, as far as I know, there's no one else at Pachamama Films who would be willing to re-enact the scenes that Amy and Mila performed in the original film. It seems to me to be a very limited company of players. I mean, who else have you got? Camille isn't around anymore.

Maybe Veronica Paintoux, but I don't see how she would be an improvement. I really liked Claudia Moscoso from Dead But Dreaming; she's young and attractive and personally, I thought she gave the best performance in the film (sorry Amy). But is she an actress who would do nudity, or even better, bondage torture? I seriously doubt it, or else they would have already cast her in a role like that. Face it, not every actress can do what Amy does, or would even want to, for any amount of money.

Galahad described her perfectly; she's a masochistic exhibitionist, and God bless her for that. If Pachamama really wants to branch out, they need 2 or 3 more like her, or else every new movie is just gonna be a new variation on The Amy Torture Show. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but some variety would help.

Jac needs to start scouting more doctor's offices in search of some new talent. Personally, I'd take Amy in any way, shape, or form [Insert drooling smiley face here.darn, there is none.]. But maybe Amy could diversify her characters a bit. Instead of mostly the innocent, maybe she could play a character that's a total “Biotch”. In fact, I had a story idea of sorts.that's also goes in the direction of the supernatural that's the vids have been heading in of late. I call it “Alice in Hell”. In it, Amy plays a complete female bad seed named “Allison”.

She sees herself as a total badass as well, so she likes going by the name of “Allison Hell”. She's mean, into drugs, lies, cheats, and steals, etc. Anyway, despite her bad-ass nature, she still does have certain fears, some of which manifests themselves in dreams. To make a long story short, she dies a very violent death (which of course includes being raped and tortured before dying.Hey, it's GIMP remember.). After dying she arrives in Hell, not knowing that it is Hell. There, for her eternal punishment, she is tortured and killed over and over by means of what terrifies her the most. And because she doesn't know it's actually Hell, her fears of dying by those means are torture beyond torture.

And each time she arrives back in Hell after dying the previous time, she has no recollection, and therefore her fears never get a chance to become numbed. Either that, or Amy could push for the Sci-Fi feature that that they put the trailer out for not too long ago. You need to view this object 1524) Charles Lonberger. Apart from a small 'jeu d'esprit' yesterday, this is my first post for some time.

Therefore may I first congratulate, somewhat belatedly but no less sincerely, our Esteemed Master and Moderator on his 15th anniversary! I look forward to the 30th! May I also thank Ms. Hesketh for all her labours on our behalf. I would also like to argue most strongly to keep the format of this site as it now is.

(May I have two, or three, votes as I feel so strongly?!). The strength of the present format is that one is introduced to images, ideas, opinions, desires that one would not initially seek out, but some/many of which are interesting. (To put my views in context, I should say that prior to this debate I had no idea what 'threaded' meant in this context). Over the last few weeks a number of issues have come up involving realism and authenticity in representations of GIMPage. I would like to come back to these on another occasion. 1528) john mahatma.

Gog wrote: To make a long story short, she dies a very violent death (which of course includes being raped and tortured before dying.Hey, it's GIMP remember.). After dying she arrives in Hell, not knowing that it is Hell. There, for her eternal punishment, she is tortured and killed over and over by means of what terrifies her the most. And because she doesn't know it's actually Hell, her fears of dying by those means are torture beyond torture. And each time she arrives back in Hell after dying the previous time, she has no recollection, and therefore her fears never get a chance to become numbed. Gog, I really like that idea. A GIMPy Groundhog Day.;) I also think I remember a sequence in Joss Whedon's TV series Angel where one of the male characters was stuck in a similar situation where each day he was horribly killed.

---------------------- Duillo of the Day is MultiV - 07 Duillo art.jpg 1533) Joanna. My thoughts on a possible 'Maleficarum II'. First, you most definitely could set it in the same time period as the original, with the same characters. It worked for the Japanese film 'Lone Wolf and Cub', which was serialized (and based on a rather graphic comic book).

So,second, let's cook up a possible storyline. Francisca and Mariana, crippled by the flames, flee from the reaches of the Inquisition, now wanted for murder. Mariana is caught and is tortured to reveal the location of Francisca, who has taken sanctuary with a mutual friend. She is forced to reveal the hide-out and now Francisca is brought in, along with the keeper of the house they were hiding in. There is a trial to address the murder.

The women claim it to be justice and plead their case, exposing the evil of 'Malificarum I' and throw their mercy on the court. The court is not so merciful, particularly towards a non-Catholic. The friend is sentenced to 25 lashes and a day in the stocks where the local villagers torment her. Francisca is tied to a cross. The final, long torture is reserved for Mariana, the monstrous Protestant, who is bound to a wheel and spun through a fire pit, the flames licking at her body with each rotation, to be spun until dead. A sudden rainstorm saves her, and as the leather binding her to the wheel loosens with the rain, she's able to slip free, find Mariana and the friend, and together they flee the city, forever searching for their sanctuary.

I forgot to mention about Ralphus' comment about Claudia Moscoso. I really liked the attractiveness of the actress who played the Egyptian myself. The one with all the dialog. Hoping for some bound skin out of that one, but oh well. ** Joanne – About your drinking game.I got a better idea. How about we find the words in the story topics.then you take a shot for everyone we find.till you get passed-out drunk.

Only to awake to being naked and bound for all us GIMPers. ** Covers – Glad you liked my story idea.

Maybe we can get one of the writers here (who would possibly also like the idea) to turn it into a full-fledged story (or screen play). **: Damn Red Riding Hood's cute! Looking like that, it's more probable that she'd attract a whole pack of wolves though. Ralphus wrote (in post 1448): So we finally get settled in here and I decide to do a real poll and guess what? Your side is getting clobbered, and it's my fault? I know I promised to shut up about this, but your reply to my post is so full of misstatements, I have to correct at least a few of the more egregious examples. First, I'm on no one's “side” as this is not an either-or situation.

For the umpteenth time, I am NOT suggesting you do away with the guest book format. My proposal is to merely add topics so some of us can sort the entries by subject matter. In essence the poll itself is misleading, because it forces a choice between two options without offering the possibility of both – which is what I am suggesting. Second, although you are right that few board moderators choose to implement the guest book option (which is telling in itself), it remains available on most popular discussion board software.

In, you'll note that virtually every one of the 29 offerings has the capability to display a flat (non-threaded) view. Third, I still think the poll on this matter is a good idea. And no, I am not at all surprised the majority of respondents – especially the more frequent visitors – want to keep the current format. Like I said, that's fine by me.

What is disappointing, assuming everyone understands the proposal, is that so many do not want to add a feature which would have no impact on them but would make life easier for others. In other words, my beef is not so much with the poll itself, but rather its wording. If a third option – “both of the above” – were included or if the question was “Should topics / threads be added as a feature to the existing format”, perhaps the results would not be so one-sided. Fourth, the search feature does absolutely nothing to organize the recent updates to the board. It's there to help determine if a subject has previously been mentioned or to find it in the archives, not to sort posts by topics readers are unaware of. Fifth, I don't ever recall saying anything was “your fault”. Sixth, if you fear that adding a sort feature will allow folks to more easily skip topics which do not interest them, well that's the whole point.

Making selective reading difficult in hopes of generating more fervor for net neutrality is where the annoying part comes in. Obviously I'm not accusing you for doing so deliberately, but the experience of wasting time annoys most of us. As for that Orson Welles (mis)quote if you get the reference, you'll know I was expecting you to find a counter-example just as much as I'd never keep my end of the bet. Anyway, all this is moot until the time comes for the next upgrade. Perhaps that would be a more appropriate time to discuss this (and many other) possible changes enhancements. Howie wrote (in Post 1451): Yup, I pretty much have all of your flicks as well.

Go figure, huh? You may have those I mentioned here, most of which are available on Nicheclips, but I'd be quite surprised if you have pretty much all of them. I've commissioned 27 custom videos since my first in 1999.

Some are no longer in circulation, some never were, and some have been shunted to dark corners of the 'net where decent folk fear to tread. I wrote about a few of of these custom projects in a post last year.

Check in the archives. John mahatma wrote: Hi. New contributor here. Enjoy Indian and native captivity scenarios. Welcome to the board. I love Indian torture, too.

I don't think Indians get enough attention around here, at least compared to Nazis or medieval scenarios. Indians were brutal and unrepentant in their tortures to white women; they would come up with all kinds of evil treatments for them and try to prolong their suffering for days, just for the sheer entertainment value. We have a story by Kishkalwa in the More Authors section of GIMP Fiction called that details some of their savagery. I've got a few more that he wrote that are even better somewhere on my hard drive. I'll see if I can add them sometime soon. ------------------------------------- Joanna wrote: Pick 5 random magazines, read the story titles, and take one shot for each time you see any the following words. Those are great.

You could add the word 'castle' to that list, too. Check out the we have right now and you can get a match on nearly every one.

The fact that the titles were so ridiculously over the top, coupled with those awesome illustrations, is what made them irresistible. If I were a 13-year old kid in a drug store in the 1970s, you can bet I would be saving up my money to buy every issue. If they would sell them to me, that is. And how long would I last?

Since I don't drink, I'd have to take shots of ice water. We'll see how long I last before I have to run to the toilet. ------------------------------------- Fritz wrote.my beef is not so much with the poll itself, but rather its wording. If a third option – “both of the above” – were included or if the question was “Should topics / threads be added as a feature to the existing format”, perhaps the results would not be so one-sided. Okay, you still have yet to show me the URL of an actual discussion website that you want to see as the template of this forum.

Your list was basically useless because we can't see any of them in action to see how flexible and maneuverable they are. And you have yet to prove me wrong when I say that I have not seen any threaded board with the discussions out in the open.every one I've seen has closed threads where clicking on a subject line was the only way to access them.

I really do want to improve this board, but show me an ex.